Ispatagonia map Radon Over
Those links all work. For some reason the show up between the and (broken link) tags. Extract what is between. I did read the IOWA report and it agrees with the data I presented. It says there is a 50% increase in lung cancer risk. Since over 90% of lung cancer occures in smokers and former smokers, the most of this increase is among smokers.
There are 2900 never smokers that die of lung cancer each year, check the links above. According to the IOWA report and my data, 1000 of those could be saved through mitigation. I don t dispute those facts. Thepatagonia drifter gtx reviews argument is whether that number vs the mitigation activity indicates it is overhyped. 1000 preventable deaths vs 2.4 million deaths otherwise, and vs over 40,000 dying of car accidents, 28,000 dying from smoking, and 1000 dying on bicycles, all of these latter activities Americans perform each day without second guessing. Therefore, the numbers suggest and American action suggests that it is overhyped. Particularly since $800 would buy a breathalyzer lockout for cars, nicotine addiction treatment for smokers, and bicycle training.
Not disputing the facts, just the overreaction to the facts. Don t confuse government action with fact or proper response. Why would the samepatagonia gift card online2 government allow sale of cigarettes and actually profit from the sale through taxes and yet try tos save a third of those smokers by radon mitigation code. We have to learn to think for ourselves.
I looked at the links Blankhost provided (you have to play with some of them to get them to work) and the information is similar to what I found when I looked into this issue. If you ask most people, they would easily say 1000 lives are worth saving. The problem is the $800 $1000 for mitigation is paid up front.
If everyone agrees that $800 $1000 dollars paid up front is cheap for fixing radon polluted homes in order to save 1000 lives per year, then what should we be paying up front on our cars to bring the death toll down and save 40,000 lives per year? If we as owners of dangepatagonia synchilla marsupial fleece pullover reviewrous cars spent that same $800 dollars up front pepatagonia gift card onliner thousand lives saved, that would be at least $32000 dollars. Saving 40,000 people per year would be a good thing wouldn t it? I m not willing to spend $32000 dollars up front though, unless it is on a lpatagonia gift card online1arge SUV
I found it interesting that one of the top radon exposure occupations was the radon mitigator as called out at this link. I guess if I was worried about radon exposure I wouldn t want that job. I ll have to point that out to my radon inspector. The EPA 4.0 pci/L level assumes a lifetime of exposure. Most people spent only a few hours a day in their basement if it is finished, and hardly ever if it is not. If your basement tests 5.0, but the rest of the house is below 4.0, you probably don t need mitigation to fall out of the EPA risk group, particularly if you don t spend alot of time down there.
Regarding the radon map and lung cancer map mismatch in Blankhost s entry, the lung cancer map prpatagonia hybrid pack vest reviewobably shows the demographics of where the smokers actually live. Lung cancer is 90% attributed to smoking. 10% of lung cancer deaths are due to other causes, probably radon exposure, with only about 4% due to exposure to radon in the home, based on what I have read in these links and others. Another correlation problem would be that people move around alot. So you may only spend 5 7 years in a high radon home before moving, so you don t get the lifetime exposure.
I think this is a great place to share information and ideas! new patagonia women's l 50k trail run shorts in turquoise msrp $55I also think it is great when people share their links to their information. That way we can read the information for ourselves. One way to avoid hype is to supply the full information and your interpretation. The EPA should state often and nopatagonia gift card online3t just in fine print in a footnote that the 4.0 pCi/L assumes lifetime exposure. They should also point out that people should address their smoking habits first. They should also point out that for nonsmokers your chance of becoming a lung cancer fatality is 1 in 2400 (1000 radon related lung cancer deaths vs 2.4 Million other deaths) as compared to 30 in 2400 for smokers. They should also provide a comparison that people can relate to such as you have a 42 in 2400 chance of being killed in a car accident. That way people can put things into perspective.
Remember, there is not one study, ever yet performed that has demonstrated that radon concentrations as found in residences increases the risk of cancer.
Let me repeat that: there is not ONE study, NONE, that have ever been conducted that has demonstrated that radon concentrations as found in residences increases the risk of cancer. Not One.
There are many studies that use what we call linear dose response model where in we take exposures amounting to millions of pCi/l and then force the data through however, even those scientists who use those kinds of models (like myself) admit that the models are invalid and do not really accurately predict the risks at low levels.
What we DO know is that the valid studies that have thus been performed consistently show that radon exposures, as commonly seen in residences, appear to LOWER the risk of lung cancer.
How ironic it may be that in the next 20 years, the value of a house may be depressed if it has a radon mitigation system, and a whole new industry springs where companies sell their services to remove those dangerous radon mitigation systems that our fool hearted, gullible grand parents had ipatagonia everlong review 5 brokennstalled in their houses!
For the science and more information behind the radon hype, you may visit my web discussions at:
Yes, the risks from radon are VERY much over hyped.
Remember, there is not one study, ever yet performed that has demonstrated that radon concentrations as found in residences increases the risk of cancer.
Let me repeat that: there is not ONE study, NONE, that have ever been conducted that has demonstrated that radon concentrations as found in residences increases the risk of cancer. Not One.
There are many studies that use what we call no threshold linear dose response model where in we take exposures amounting to millions of pCi/l and then force the data through zero however, even those scientists who use those kinds of mpatagonia guide pants below the waistodels (like myself) admit that the models are invalid and do not really accurately predict the risks at low levels.
What we DO know is that the valid stpatagonia guide pants linerudies that have thus been performed consistently show that radon exposures, as commonly seen in residences, appear to LOWER the risk of lung cancer.
How ironic it may be that in the next 20 years, the value of a house may be depressed if it has a radon mitigation system, and a whole nepatagonia guide pants 5tw industry springs where companies sell their services to remove those dangerous radon mitigation systems that our fool hearted, gullible grand parents had installed in their houses!
For thpatagonia gift card online0e science and more information behind the radon hype, you may visit my web discussions at:Radon: Truth vs. myth
